Franklin Merrell-Wolff continues his analysis of the meaning of paradox by contrasting the Buddhistic point of view outlined in the previous discourse with the Vedantic orientation outlined here. He then goes on to examine how these standpoints can be considered as paradoxical and that the ultimate meaning intended here is not simply a one-sided positivism or a one-sided substantialism, but rather a “positivistic-substantialism.” He then proceeds to consider a fourth form of the paradox growing out of the self-analysis of Shankara and concludes that the end of the yoga is the Realization of “knowledge that can never be known.”